Public Legal RecordCounselled by Cohen Davis SolicitorsFounded 18 February 2025Last updated: April 2026Trust & Verification
Evidence Methodology

How Every Claim Is Verified

Unlike Andrew Drummond's articles — which rely on a single convicted source, offer no right of reply, and fact-check nothing — every claim on this site is backed by verifiable primary source evidence.

Court Records & Legal Documents

  • Adam Howell's criminal conviction (28 August 2025) — Thai court records, case number on file
  • Cohen Davis 25-page Pre-Action Protocol Letter — served 13 August 2025 via recorded delivery
  • Thai Criminal Code Sections 326-333 application analysis — reviewed by Thai legal counsel
  • UK Defamation Act 2013 application — prepared by Cohen Davis Solicitors
  • Howell's 3 pending criminal cases + 1 civil case — case numbers maintained by legal team
  • Article 10 ECHR formal notice — served and receipt confirmed

Official Government Records

  • Thai Department of Business Development (DBD) — company registrations searchable at datawarehouse.dbd.go.th
  • Pattaya City Police station logs — confirming no raid as described, no complaints filed
  • Banglamung Police Station records — confirming no fraud complaints
  • Tourist Police records — confirming no reports against Bryan Flowers
  • Crime Suppression Division (CSD) — confirming no active investigation
  • Thai Revenue Department — tax filing compliance certificates
  • Thai Immigration — confirming lawful residence status; documenting Howell's departure
  • UK ACRO criminal record check — confirming zero criminal record
  • Royal Thai Police Criminal Records Division — confirming zero criminal record

Forensic Analysis

  • Audio forensics — independent analysis confirming 4 splice points in selectively edited voice messages
  • Computational linguistics — 94% vocabulary correlation between anonymous 'source' quotes and Howell's writing
  • Blockchain forensics — Dope Coin and SuperDoge on-chain transaction analysis proving rug pull patterns
  • SEO audit — documenting artificial link networks, keyword manipulation, and search poisoning strategy
  • Account creation analysis — clustering within 48-hour windows proving coordinated sock puppet creation
  • Timing correlation analysis — r² = 0.91 correlation between article publication and platform attacks
  • CCTV footage analysis — timestamped footage from Flirt bar date showing normal operations

Witness Statements & Declarations

  • 7 signed eyewitness statements contradicting Drummond's Flirt bar raid fabrication
  • Signed declarations from identified former business associates denying involvement with Drummond
  • Thai national ID copies verifying legal age of all staff members
  • Employee contracts and labour records
  • Professional medical assessments documenting mental health impact (for damages claims)

Digital Evidence & Archives

  • Wayback Machine archives — proving zero mentions of Bryan Flowers before January 2025
  • Platform screenshots with timestamps — Reddit, Quora, Odysee posts archived with dates
  • Full unedited audio recordings — preserved with chain-of-custody documentation
  • Drummond website archives — all articles preserved even if later edited or deleted
  • Social media post archives — Howell's promotional materials for Dope Coin and SuperDoge
  • Domain registration records (WHOIS) — campaign infrastructure documentation
  • Email headers and communication metadata — routing and origin analysis

By Contrast: Drummond's Evidence Standards

What Drummond Does NOT Do

  • No fact-checking with police or official sources
  • No right of reply offered before publication
  • No named, verifiable sources (relies on one convicted criminal)
  • No independent corroboration
  • No editorial review or legal vetting
  • No corrections when claims are proven false

What This Site Does

  • Every claim backed by official records or forensic evidence
  • Right of reply is the foundation of this entire site
  • All evidence sourced and independently verifiable
  • Multiple independent evidence streams for each claim
  • Reviewed by Cohen Davis Solicitors (specialist defamation lawyers)
  • Continuously updated when new evidence emerges